01
Infrastructure as Code
Terraform and CDK configurations making your infrastructure reproducible, version-controlled, and reviewable — no more manual console changes.
- Terraform / CDK
- State management
- Module reuse
OSYSTIC
Loading page…
Loading page…
We design and implement cloud infrastructure on AWS and GCP — from initial architecture through Kubernetes, CI/CD, and the observability stack your team needs to operate confidently.
We scope around the system you actually need to operate, maintain, and operate — not a fixed vendor product or a one-size-fits-all implementation.
Terraform and CDK configurations making your infrastructure reproducible, version-controlled, and reviewable — no more manual console changes.
EKS and GKE cluster design, workload configuration, Helm chart development, and operational runbooks for container-based deployments.
IAM role design, VPC network segmentation, secret management, and security controls mapped to client-defined requirements across AWS and GCP.
Right-sizing analysis, Graviton/ARM migration, Reserved Instance planning, and architectural changes that reduce cloud spend.
Metrics, logs, and traces in a coherent operational view — with alerting that surfaces real problems before users report them.
Each engagement is broken into defined phases with reviewable outputs. Scope can adapt, but accountability stays visible.
Current state assessment, target architecture definition, and agreement on non-functional requirements and cost envelope.
IAM role design, VPC network architecture, secret management, and a client-defined security-control baseline before production provisioning.
Terraform or CDK implementation of all infrastructure — reproducible, version-controlled, and reviewable via pull request.
Dev, staging, and production environments provisioned identically via the same IaC — reducing environment drift and 'works in dev' failure modes.
Phased migration plan with rollback capability and low/zero-downtime techniques where required and technically feasible. Runbooks are written before execution.
Technology choices follow your environment, operating constraints, team capability, and long-term ownership requirements.
The same technical capability can require very different controls, integrations, and operating models across industries.
SaaS platform infrastructure, multi-region deployments, developer productivity infrastructure.
Cloud architecture designed to support regulated workloads, with encryption, audit logging, and disaster-recovery controls.
Healthcare cloud architecture designed around privacy, access control, encrypted storage, secure networking, and auditability requirements.
IoT data ingestion infrastructure, edge-to-cloud pipelines, OT/IT integration.
The exact architecture and delivery plan depend on your environment. These answers describe how OSYSTIC approaches the work.
Both. Most teams are committed to one cloud and we work within that. For greenfield projects we can advise on the tradeoffs, but both are mature enough that the choice matters less than how you use either.
Where low/zero-downtime cutover is required and feasible, we use patterns such as additive infrastructure changes, blue/green deployments, and controlled traffic shifting, with a documented rollback procedure.
Usually yes, but we audit first. Common wins include right-sizing, switching to Graviton/ARM, and Reserved Instance planning. We give you a written estimate before starting optimisation work.
Yes. All IaC code, state configuration, runbooks, and architecture documentation are yours. No ongoing dependency on us to make infrastructure changes.
Tell us your current setup and what is causing pain. We will come back with a clear picture of what to fix and in what order.